Risk Responses - There are five general responses to address any project risks that need to be managed.
• Leave it
In this approach, the project manager looks at the risk and decides to do nothing. This can happen for one of three reasons.
The project manager may decide that the potential impact of the risk on the project is not substantial enough to require a risk response. This would typically be the case for low level risks and many medium level risks.
The project manager may feel that the risk should be managed, but that the negative impact of the risk is not worth the cost and effort required to manage the risk.
There may not be any reasonable and practical activities available to manage the risk. This is different from the prior reason where the cost was more than the benefit. In this case, there are is no practical way to manage the risk, even if the risk has been identified as high.
For instance, it is possible that there is a risk of your sponsor leaving and a new sponsor canceling the project. In fact, you may know that the sponsor is up for a promotion and that this scenario has some possibility of occurring.
However, you may not be in a position to do much about it as long as the current sponsor is in place, and you may just need to leave it and see how events play out.
• Monitor the risk
In this case, the project manager does not proactively manage the risk, but monitors it to see whether it is more or less likely to occur as time goes on. If it looks more likely to occur, the team must formulate a different response at a later time.
This approach can work for serious risks that are not likely to occur. Rather than put a plan in place immediately, the project manager creates a plan only if it looks likely that the risk will occur.
The advantage is that scarce resources are expended only on those risks that are likely to occur. The disadvantage is that the delay in addressing the risk might make it less likely that the risk can be successfully managed in the future.
This is also a good approach if you have identified a risk that should be managed, but the risk event is far off in the future.
For instance, if your risk event is nine months in the future, it may not make sense to spend resources to manage the risk at this time. A better approach might be to monitor the risk on a monthly basis. It is possible that over time the risk will go away because of other circumstances.
However, if it does not go away, the team will still need to manage the risk in the coming months.
• Avoid the risk
Avoiding the risk means that the condition that is causing the problem is eliminated. For instance, if a part of the project has high risk associated with it, the whole part of the project is eliminated.
For instance, risks associated with a particular vendor might be avoided if another vendor is used instead.
This is a very effective way to eliminate risks but obviously can be used only in certain unique circumstances. In another example, you may have a project risk associated with implementing a solution in multiple locations.
Once the risk is identified, the sponsor may change the scope of the project to only implement in one location. In this way, the risk of implementing at multiple locations has been avoided.
• Move the risk
In some instances, the responsibility for managing a risk can be removed from the project by assigning the risk to another entity or third party. For instance, outsourcing a function to a third party might eliminate that risk for the project team.
The third party might have particular expertise that allows them to do the work without the risk. Even if the risk is still present, it now is up to another party to resolve.
Another example of moving the risk is buying insurance. In a simple example, you may have a very fragile and valuable part that needs to be shipped to your project team. There is some risk that the material will be damaged.
You might move the financial risk by purchasing insurance on the shipment. Of course, if the shipment is damaged, you may still lose time waiting for a replacement part to be shipped.
However, you no longer have the financial risk. In exchange for an insurance payment, the insurer now has the financial risk.
• Mitigate the risk
In most cases, this is the approach to take. Mitigating the risk means that you put in place a set of proactive steps to ensure that the risk does not occur. Another purpose of mitigation is to ensure that if the risk occurs, the negative impact of the risk is minimized.
Libro El Director de Proyectos Práctico -
Un Método probado de 28 Pasos para completar tu Proyecto Exitosamente
EL DIRECTOR DE PROYECTOS PRACTICO -
Por fin ─ un libro sencillo con un método paso a paso para completar tu proyecto.
¡Y sin tener conocimiento previo sobre administración de proyectos!
Toda la "paja" de la metodología de dirección de proyectos fue eliminada, dejando solo lo que es absolutamente útil para completar la tarea.
El Director de Proyectos Práctico, Project Management for Small Projects.
Un libro pensado en el líder de proyectos empírico que salió ganador de la rifa del tigre. Pues ya tiene la responsabilidad de un proyecto, pero que no sabe ni por donde empezar. Necesita una receta ABC para seguir.
Contiene 260 páginas perfectamente detalladas con ejemplos e ilustraciones, que te llevan de la mano hasta completar tu proyecto.
Pruébalo, síguelo, ten éxito. O sigue haciendo lo mismo... :(
Compra aquí El Director de Proyectos Práctico en su versión electrónica─
BONO ADICIONAL: El libro incluye todos los templates─plantillas─que necesitas, listos para ser usadas. No necesitas comprar nada mas.
COPYRIGHT © 2007-2012 por Hector Olvera Padilla 1853071. Reproduction in whole or in part, or translation without written permission is prohibited. "PMP®", "PMBOK®", and "PMI®" are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.